Hello, We would like to move our project to SQLAlchemy 2.0, due to it supporting the new oracledb package as well as Mapped annotation, which significantly simplifies our model definition and usage. From a brief view into SQLAlchemy usage in Rasa, it seems to be very minimal, and the constraint on SQLAlchemy can be relaxed to support 2.0.x without much worry. Although, going through their migration guide and process would give a more definitive answer. Thank you,

Are you asking about use of 2.0 for the action server or tracker store?

We use Rasa as a dependency to a larger project, and within that project, we have our own SQLAlchemy models and queries. That’s where we would like to use SQLAlchemy 2.0. That’s to say, Rasa pinning SQLAlchemy to <2.0 is our limiting factor.

SQLAlchemy 2.0

Rasa Open Source

stephens (Greg Stephens) March 30, 2023, 8:22pm 4

I don’t see an open Jira item on this so you should submit one. Described here.

Topic		Replies	Views
Problem with SQLAlchemy 2.0 Feedback on Rasa Open Source	3	1913	October 27, 2023
Getting SQLAlchemy error while running rasa x command [Deprecated] Rasa X Community Edition	8	2180	April 13, 2022
Unable to train rasa in macos Rasa Open Source	0	37	August 4, 2024
Cannot install Rasa X - sqlalchemy.exc.OperationalError: (sqlite3.OperationalError) no such column: True [Deprecated] Rasa X Community Edition	4	2029	July 27, 2021
Evolution of support for Oracle and alternatives Rasa Open Source	0	263	May 18, 2022

SQLAlchemy 2.0

Related topics