Hey @CharuchithRanjit, I don’t think there’s a straightforward solution – after all, plurals may be formed in different ways (besides the usual
-es suffixes). I guess your best bet is to:
- include the plural values in the lookup table
- if you also want to map both
tables to the same entity value (e.g.
table), add the variations (here
tables) as synonyms in your data
Alternatively, you could generate a long regex for all the possible values in both singular and plural.
I think all of the above should be relatively easy to do programmatically given that you’ve got a table of all the possible values. The only pitfall is, as I mentioned, if some of the words have unusual plural forms